Fantasy Football Rankings: RB - Week 1
|
September 10, 2010 @ 18:16:09
|
|
|
|
|
|
By KFFL Staff
Fantasy Football Weekly Rankings
INJURY DEFINITIONS
- P - Probable - player has a 75 percent chance of playing
- Q - Questionable - player has a 50 percent chance of playing
- D - Doubtful - player has a 25 percent chance of playing
- O - Out - player is not going to play
- IR - Injured Reserve - player is out for the remainder of the season
KFFL Fantasy Football Rankings Key
Note - Displayed statistics are from past four weeks unless less than four weeks of data is available.
RK - Overall rank, not absolute rank; each option is part of a tier of one or more players
Fan Pos - Fantasy position and/or status of player this week for 12-team leagues with 16-player rosters
|
1
|
No. 1 option at position this week |
INJ-XXX
|
Injured; playing status for this week is indicated by GTD (game-time decision), QUE (questionable), DBT (doubtful) or OUT |
|
2
|
No. 2 option at position this week |
INJ
|
Injured; playing status for this week is to be determined |
|
3
|
No. 3 option at position this week |
INJ-PUP
|
Injured; on Physically Unable to Perform list and not eligible to play until team activates him |
|
Flex
|
Option for flex spot at position this week |
INJ-NFI
|
Injured; on Non-Football Injury list and not eligible to play until team activates him |
|
Bench
|
Not a recommended option at position this week |
INJ-IR
|
Injured; on Reserve/Injured list and not eligible to play this season |
|
BYE
|
On a bye and not playing this week |
|
|
Tier - Grouping of similarly ranked options this week; one player may be considered over others in same tier based on preference
Rnk Chng - Indicates if player has moved up or down since previous release of rankings
|
UP-NR
|
Was not ranked in previous release |
UP-##
|
Has moved up since previous release; number indicates previous rank |
|
|
|
DN-##
|
Has moved up since previous release; number indicates previous rank |
SP/WP - Indicates if player has a matchup that makes him a strong play or a weak play this week
|
SP
|
Has a favorable matchup and could exceed usual production; not an endorsement to play any player in one tier over one in a higher tier |
WP
|
Has an unfavorable matchup and could fail to meet level of usual production; not an endorsement to bench any player in one tier in favor of one in a lower tier |
FA - Indicates if player is a target on waiver wire or in free-agent pool
|
FA-A
|
May be available in your league and should be acquired, especially if you need help at position |
FA-WL
|
May be available in your league and should be monitored, especially if you need help at position. He may be worthy of acquiring soon |
|
FA-L
|
May be available in your league and could be acquired, especially if you need help at position |
FA-OW
|
May be available in your league and should be acquired if you need a one-week play; has a favorable matchup but may not necessarily have long-term value |
|
1
|
Skot, at 08:00 on 09/04/10, says:
What is the reason for ranking Foster so low at 22? You have Stewart ranked higher and he is sharing carries and playing Giants. Is Colts run Def. that good this year?
|
|
|
2
|
Jim, at 03:58 on 09/06/10, says:
How can I use these charts to compare WR against RB to pick between them for my W/R slot? (Trying to decide between Marques Colston and Matt Forte, assuming Colston heals...)
|
|
|
3
|
Cory J. Bonini, at 09:43 on 09/07/10, says:
Skot - Stewart and Foster are in the same tier of the rankings, which means they are essentially interchangeable. Stewart will still touch the ball a fair amount, and Foster has to deal with a pass-first offense working against him. Indy's run D is solid, and the Giants' is a little overrated. Go with the back you're more comfortable with.
|
|
|
4
|
Cory J. Bonini, at 09:45 on 09/07/10, says:
Jim - Colston should be healthy enough. Detriot's run defense should be better, but until they prove it I'd probably go Forte. Minnesota's secondary is weak, though, so Colston is a better boom-or-bust choice.
|
|
|
5
|
chrisgio, at 11:16 on 09/09/10, says:
someone is offering me Ryan Grant for Mendenhall...is this a good deal?
|
|
|
6
|
Skot, at 04:35 on 09/09/10, says:
Cory, so you would start DeAngelo Williams over Foster then? That's my predicament. Thanks for your answer.
|
|
