Draft day burden

by BaseballHQ.com on February 11, 2010 @ 00:00:00 PDT

 


Even in Roto, things aren't always what they seem. A Draft Day roster that looks loaded with reasonably priced players may still bear "burdens" that can hamper the team. Each burden is associated with a "hidden" dimension of fantasy value - a component that isn't factored into published projections but is nonetheless real and should be reflected in your target salaries.

Let's start here: Which of these players would you rather own?

 
AB
HR
RBI
SB
AVG
Eligibility
Player A
150
1
10
5
.290
OF
Player B
150
1
10
5
.290
OF, 1B, 2B

Obviously, the answer is Player B, the one with the wider positional eligibility. Now, to indicate this preference, the price of Player B should be higher that that of Player A. But because the players have the same projected stats, a fantasy guide would assign the same salary to both.

This is a mistake. Positional flexibility gives owners sharply greater latitude in improving their roster and coping with misfortune, and it is an unsung hero of championship teams. A lack of flexibility creates positional burden, in which players are stuck in their drafted slots, limiting the pool of talent that the owner can tap for help.

Recommended adjustment: In leagues with a one-game positional-eligibility requirement, add $1 to a player's projected value for each additional eligible position. In leagues with five- or 20-game requirements, add $2 and $3 per extra position, respectively.

Try this one: In a keeper league, which of these players would you rather own?

 
AB
HR
RBI
SB
AVG
Fantasy Contract
Player A
500
25
70
2
.250
Last Year
Player B
500
25
70
3
.250
First Year

Again, identical stats, yet the greater value is surely Player B, the one with the fresh contract, because he can be dealt to both contending and non-contending clubs. Fantasy guides can't consider contract status, but young pacts are one of the purest sources of value in a keeper league.

Contractual burden arises when much of a roster is in the final year of their contracts. Like positional burden, contractual burden constricts dealing, since end-of-term players hold little allure to the teams vying for next year. Avoid situations where every player at a position is at the end of his agreement; trade one for a player with a fresher contract or at another position.

Recommended adjustment: Add $2-$3 to the target salary of players with at least two years remaining on their contracts. Thus, it may make sense to drop a player with the aim of re-drafting him - even if his new price is a buck or two higher - if doing so re-opens his contract.

A bit trickier: Which of these players would you rather own?

 
AB
HR
RBI
SB
AVG
Eligibility
Player A
550
35
100
10
.300
SS
Player B
550
35
100
10
.300
OF

For $30-plus players like these, you should prefer Player B. The reason is that outfield bears a lighter replacement burden. Replacement burden is the task of finding a similarly productive fill-in for a player who has been lost to injury, demotion, or out-of-league trade. When injuries strike - and they will - teams with greater replacement burdens suffer more.

Replacement burden is heaviest at those positions with the shallowest depth. One measure of depth is last year's average value (LYAV) of this year's projected $0-$2 players. Here were LYAV's by position for 2000:

Position
LYAV
OF
$5.62
3B
$3.64
2B
$3.44
RP
$3.14
C
$2.86
SS
$2.14
1B
$2.00
SP
$1.24

By far, the deepest position is outfield - the LYAV of available players is over $5. Clearly, the pool of undrafted outfielders harbors players of sizable skills. At the other end of the scale is starting pitcher, with a LYAV near $1. There is little potential among the free-agent starters - the projected low performers this year were also low performers last year - so if an expensive starter goes down, you will likely have to pick up a starter of minimal skills, or go without a starter at all.

Recommended adjustment: Throw your money at outfield, third base and second base, and avoid big liabilities among starting pitchers, first basemen and shortstop.

Final question: Which of these post-Draft Day lines would you rather own?

 
AB
HR
RBI
SB
AVG
Team A
5,000
60
200
110
.317
Team B
5,000
80
270
80
.312

According to Art McGee's Standings Gain Point (SGP) denominators, both rosters capture 32 SPGs. However, Team A is overly strong in SB and AVG, whereas Team B has its SGP evenly divided among the four categories. The better line, then, is Team B, because of its lighter categorical burden. Categorical burden reflects a shortfall or an excess of a Roto category.

There's no point to cornering a category in Roto - unlike in poker, you can't hide your hand. Although it is true that an owner with a lack of steals will rate speedsters highly, it is equally true that an owner with a surplus of steals will rate them barely at all - and every other owner knows it. The burden to sell a recognizably worthless asset is as high as that to acquire a prized one.

The toll of categorical burden comes from having to trade your way out of it. Fantasy leagues are rotten bazaars. Even the largest league has only a dozen potential trading partners. Only a fraction of those teams will covet the stat you wish to sell, and only a fraction of those teams will possess the stat you wish to buy. Consequently, trades are almost invariably sub-optimal exchanges. This judgment doesn't even weigh the time and effort wasted on negotiating.

Recommended adjustment: Cherish balance. Track your team stats during the draft and lower target prices for players who contribute to already solid categories.

As you build your team, recognize all four burdens - positional, replacement, contractual and categorical. The suggested adjustments could make the difference between raising a bid or losing an undervalued player. Above all, be aware that published player projections don't tell the whole story about Roto worth.

Facebook Twitter Google +

About BaseballHQ.com

Ron Shandler began publishing statistical reports for baseball analysts and fantasy leaguers in 1986. Since then, his enterprise has grown into one of the largest information providers in the industry, producing quality products continuously and over a longer period than any other fantasy baseball company.

Our writers and analysts are paid professionals, not weekend hobbyists or corporate staffers. While other information services seek out professional journalists who play fantasy baseball, we seek out successful fantasy players with innovative ideas who know how to write. That's our difference, and it's a huge one.

Don't miss these great reports....

What do you think? Sound off!



Recent KFFL releases